Understanding the Importance of Guidelines in Politics: A Perspective from Organisational Management

Introduction

Unity in religion is achieved through adherence to guidelines, specifically in matters of faith. In contrast, the failure to achieve unity in politics often stems from the absence of clear guidelines, especially in discussions, debates, opinions, and critiques. The lack of structured principles can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts. In this blog, I will share my insights and practices based on my experience in organisational management.

My Approach to Organisational Management

As someone with extensive experience in organisational management, I adhere to the following principles:

1. Laws and Regulations: These provide a foundational framework that ensures consistency and fairness in decision-making processes.
2. Systems and Procedures: Efficient systems and procedures help streamline operations and maintain order within the organisation.
3. Organisational Structure: A clear structure defines roles and responsibilities, facilitating effective communication and accountability.
4. Adherence to Faith and Tradition: As a Muslim, I uphold my religious beliefs. Additionally, as a Malay, I respect our customs and traditions.
5. Mutual Respect: In any collaborative effort, mutual respect among colleagues is essential for fostering a positive and productive environment.

Participation in Meetings

My participation in various meetings, whether as an invitee or in an advisory capacity, is guided by the aforementioned principles. Although politics is not my primary field, my focus lies in land management, economics, and education. When involved in political discussions, I offer insights related to organisational structures, laws, systems, leadership, and operations based on my decades of experience. It is important to note that:

1. I am not a member of any political bureau: Hence, I do not aim to make recommendations.
2. I am not on any committee within a political party: Therefore, I do not make decisions on behalf of the party.

My contributions are purely opinions and perspectives intended to add value to discussions.

Avoiding Misunderstandings

In meetings, debates, or discussions, it is crucial to distinguish between facts, opinions, personal statements, and assumptions to avoid misunderstandings. For instance:

• Statement of Fact: “UMNO is part of the Unity Government.”
• Opinion: “UMNO is in the government because of Zahid.”

Disagreement on opinions should be handled respectfully. For example, if I disagree with UMNO’s involvement in the government, my arguments are based on my rationale, not on opposition to any individual. Respecting different viewpoints is essential, and attempts to impose one’s correctness without evidence are unnecessary.

Clarifying Conflicts and Confusions

It is important to clarify potential conflicts or confusions during discussions or meetings. For example:

• UMNO’s role in the government: A factual statement does not imply support or opposition.
• My voting preference: “I vote for PAS at the state level and UMNO at the federal level.” This is my stance, not a criticism of other parties or individuals’ choices.

My Principles

1. I vote for PAS to govern Kelantan: Not to be in opposition.
2. I vote for UMNO to govern at the federal level: Not to be in opposition.

In terms of risk management, it is more practical to be part of a government that includes DAP rather than being in opposition to it. Ensuring the representation of Malay interests in the government is critical.

Concerns and Risks

Several concerns and risks need to be considered in the current political landscape:

1. The absence of a major Malay party in opposition.
2. Succession plans if key leaders like DSA face issues: Who would become the Prime Minister—Zahid or Rafizi?
3. Lack of practical and workable formulas: To establish a government dominated by Malay-majority parties.
4. Issues within major Malay parties:

• UMNO: Declining support among Malays.
• PAS: Weak leadership.
• PB: Corruption issues.

The hostility among these parties, both internally and externally, exacerbates these issues. Additionally, the feudal mindset and colonial attitudes among Malays, such as hero-worship and party fanaticism, hinder unity. The prolonged sowing of hate and envy has fostered conflicts among Malay parties.

Evaluating Political Parties

To assess political parties, I consider the following criteria (rated 1-5):

1. History and Establishment: Strength and breadth of branches.
2. Track Record: Achievements, facts, and evidence.
3. Policies and Leadership: Party policies and leadership records.
4. Manifestos and Promises: Fulfillment, failures, deceit, and lies.
5. Changes and Reforms: Within the party.

Risk Management in Politics

In risk management, I evaluate the likelihood and impact of various factors. For instance:

1. Political Risks: Evaluated based on power dynamics and stability.
2. Economic Risks: Evaluated based on economic policies and performance.
3. Educational Risks: Evaluated based on policies affecting education.
4. Land Management Risks: Evaluated based on policies affecting land use.
5. Religious Risks: Evaluated based on policies affecting religious practices.

The highest risks are associated with economic and political factors, while religious risks are comparatively lower.

Conclusion

Understanding and implementing guidelines are crucial for unity and effective management, whether in religion, politics, or organisational settings. Clear principles and structured approaches can help mitigate misunderstandings and foster respectful, productive discussions. By sharing my perspective, I hope to contribute to a more informed and open-minded approach to political and organisational discourse.